Movie “Stalker”. Opinions and Movie Trailer.

Rate this post



Movie Stalker Description
A grey and unnamed city is the Zone, a space guarded by barbed wire and troopers, where the regular regulations of physics are subject to frequent anomalies. A stalker guides two males into the zone, namely to a dilemma in which deep-seated needs are granted.



Soviet Union



  • Stalker: Aleksandr Kaydanovskiy
  • Author: Anatoliy Solonitsyn
  • Professor: Nikolay Grinko
  • Stalker’s Spouse: Alisa Freyndlikh
  • Martha, Stalker’s Daughter: Natasha Abramova
  • Author’s Companion: Faime Jurno
  • Lyuger, Proprietor of Cafe: Evgeniy Kostin
  • Police Patrol: Raymo Rendi


  • Manufacturing Fetch: Andrei Tarkovsky
  • Editor: Lyudmila Feiginova
  • Costume Fetch: Nelli Fomina
  • Assistant Director: Larisa Tarkovskaya
  • Cinematography: Georgi Rerberg
  • Producer: Aleksandra Demidova
  • Director of Photography: Aleksandr Knyazhinsky
  • Music Editor: Raisa Lukina
  • Director of Photography: Leonid Kalashnikov
  • Author: Arkadiy Strugatskiy
  • Author: Boris Strugatskiy
  • Normal Music Composer: Eduard Artemyev
  • Assistant Director: Evgeny Tsymbal
  • Assistant Director: Arvo Iho
  • Manufacturing Supervisor: Willie Geller
  • Art Route: Shavkat Abdusalamov
  • Situation Decoration: Rashit Safiullin
  • Makeup Artist: Vitaliy Lvov
  • Assistant Director: Mariya Chugunova
  • Sound Clothier: Vladimir Sharun
  • Manufacturing Fetch: Aleksan
  • Poem: Arseny Tarkovsky
  • Manufacturing Fetch: Aleksandr Boym

Credit: TheMovieDb

ALSO REVIEW: Film "The Survivor". Opinions and Movie Trailer.


  1. This movie is like an onion, has extra than one layers. To grasp it, that you just must to possibly must be very cautious and pacient. It will most likely be compulsory to concentrate on movie and never doing anything else else whereas you gaze it, because can get to you don’t, that you just cannot comprehend it.

  2. This if truth be told is the cinematic same of “watch out for you wish for”. Two characters – a teacher and a professor, survey out a “stalker” who can lead them via the maze of challenges that culminates in an carefully restricted issue know because the zone. Why? Rumour has it, that once in that zone that you just must to possibly fabricate needs that could straight away come factual. What’s this issue? Is it precise, imaginary, alien, all of those – or it is all factual a cerebral hallucination of a issue that, like El Dorado, we imagine to be where all of our concerns can plod away, be solved, eradicated. It’s loosely in step with the Strugatsky brothers early seventies sci-fi unusual “Roadside Picnic” but it absolutely’s fair to divulge that Andrei Tarkovsky opens up the extra linear aspects of their tale leaving us with a unheard of less outlined and extra intangible assortment of threads as these males endure important travails to accept to a issue – that frequently resembles what I imagine Chernobyl to get behold like after it exploded. As with so many aspects of human aspiration, the account is all about what I’d call the crawl – the slither or the sort – with out the characters ever if truth be told shining what it is that they will if truth be told desire if they develop if truth be told cease their diagram. Again, the director affords us with hundreds bits of this naughty, generally dangerous and idea-upsetting Rubik’s cube – but it absolutely is incomplete. We are unsleeping of it is repeatedly going to be. We, the audience, must carry a little bit of of ourselves to this relate occasion. There is a denouement – three males in a room. One (Nikolai Grinko) with a hefty nuclear bomb that he believes could possibly provide a reply; one other (Anatoly Solonitsyn) who’s darkest identification smartly outmanoeuvres his ostensibly smartly which manner reasons for being there and obviously the stalker himself (Alexander Kaidanovsky). This production is intentionally, and successfully slowly paced. The dialogue could possibly additionally be intense, their frustrations and dreams smartly encapsulated; but it absolutely can additionally be sparing – there are hundreds of intervals of protracted silences from them all. Accompanied by an eerily complimentary get from Eduard Artemyev, we are left with an experience slightly than factual a film. I saw it on a mighty display hide hide, and can get to that you just can I would suggest that. It helps you to live centered on the advanced and quirky issue at the same time as bringing out the finely crafted bleakness, and hope, of the pictures.

  3. **More sort than affirm material.**

    This turned into once my first contact with the cinematographic work of Andrei Tarkovsky, a Soviet filmmaker who would close his occupation launch air his native country when he fell into disgrace for allegedly spending too unheard of cash on films that weren’t unheard of of the expense. A regrettable perspective, but habitual of countries that decide to utilize money on missiles than on improve for culture and training, namely after serious about how unpleasant and insubmissive generally is a polished population succesful of pondering with out anyone from a occasion announcing what It’s the lawful ingredient.

    This is not very, then yet again, a approved Soviet film, loaded with subliminal messages, extra or less order, demonizing the smartly off and praising the anguish and dignity of workers. Quite the opposite. Tarkovsky takes us to a desolate world, interestingly hostage to repressive authority. There is nothing fine there. And there is a residence where no person can plod, called the Zone, throughout which there is, supposedly, a room that makes the dreams of those that approach there come factual. On the opposite hand, the challenge is unbelievable.

    Being a Russian film, it is clearly a nice, dreary, heavy film. Let’s face it, it is to be expected: Russians like mighty things. Huge countries, mighty armies, large cannons and missiles. Russia cultivates that taste for gigantism, of which the Tsar-Pushka is a approved symbol. It’s fascinating to behold the total lot, the sort the film develops, in deliberate slowness, is tricky and shadowy. The cinematography is partly in sepia (coloration comes later, and the colours are straight away associated to coming into the prohibited issue) and has been smartly crafted, as get the sets and filming areas. The the leisure simply would not matter: it is a film that’s nearly nonetheless, and that locations sort above substance.

Comments are closed.